Implementing Cybersecurity Solutions for Space Network Protection

Summary

This article focuses on improving the security of space networks by using multiple layers of protection to guard against cyberthreats and ensure the systems remain strong and reliable. It highlights the need for new encryption methods for smaller satellites, which have limited hardware capabilities, to keep their data safe. The study emphasizes the defense-in-depth model, which involves using several independent security measures to protect against different types of attacks. The research incorporates advanced technologies like consortium blockchain to enhance wireless link security and ensure trusted access and secure interconnection of nodes. The article also stresses the importance of continuous evaluation and adaptation of security measures due to the evolving landscape of space operations and inherent vulnerabilities in wireless links and network security.

Introduction

Space network security is crucial due to the increasing reliance on satellite services for critical applications, making them vulnerable to cyberthreats [1]. Integrating new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain in space information networks raises security concerns, emphasizing the need for robust cybersecurity measures. One well-known organization in the space sector called TruSat provides communication, navigation, and surveillance services, which are essential for economic, social, and environmental activities. By implementing innovative solutions, space network operations can defend against cyberthreats [2].

Traditional public key infrastructures (PKIs) face challenges in space due to the need for a single trusted entity and the difficulty of verifying public keys remotely. TruSat extends PKIs for spacecraft networks to address this by introducing a decentralized certificate authority scheme and lightweight certificate validation methods, enhancing security while avoiding single points of failure.

Additionally, intrusion detection systems are essential for satellites, focusing on penetration testing to identify attack scenarios and develop effective monitoring systems onboard [3]. Moving target defenses offer a proactive defense strategy, reducing adversarial knowledge by 97% and enhancing cyber-resilience against exfiltration attacks. These approaches collectively strengthen space network operations against cyberthreats, ensuring authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality in the face of evolving risks.

Problem Statement

Encryption plays a crucial role in space network security but can also introduce vulnerabilities [4]. Although it is essential for preventing cyberattacks in telecom operations systems like those used in the International Space Station, encryption can lead to communication delays and performance overheads. It is necessary for safeguarding data in space information networks, yet the openness of satellite channels and limited node resources make these networks susceptible to various attacks. Moreover, smaller satellites face challenges implementing encryption due to hardware limitations, highlighting the need for innovative encryption solutions like chaos theory-based algorithms [5]. Therefore, while encryption enhances security in space networks, carefully considering its impact on performance and developing advanced encryption methods are essential to mitigate potential vulnerabilities. This study aims to develop a comprehensive strategy to enhance the cybersecurity of space networks by implementing a holistic approach addressing various aspects of network protection. It involves strategically applying multiple layers of security measures to defend against potential cyberthreats and ensure the resilience of space network infrastructures.

Discussion

The integrated, holistic cybersecurity strategic plan for space network protection encompasses a comprehensive approach to safeguarding space-earth integrated networks and space systems from cyberthreats, leveraging advanced technologies and multilayered security strategies [6]. The plan recognizes the inherent vulnerabilities of wireless links in space-earth networks and the inadequacy of traditional security technologies due to these networks’ unique characteristics and lightweight deployment requirements. To address these challenges, the plan incorporates consortium blockchain technology to enhance wireless link security, ensuring trusted access, secure interconnection of nodes, and effective network attack supervision.

Business Criticality of Space Assets, Services, and Systems

Space operations encompass a broad range of activities, services, and critical assets essential for maintaining vital societal functions, including health, safety, security, and economic or social well-being [7]. Critical space infrastructure (CSI) is a complex system that includes workforce, environment, facilities, and multidirectional interactions, highlighting the interdependence of various elements vital for space operations shown in Figure 1 [7]. Increasing reliance on space assets underscores the need for a standardized comprehensive cyber-resilience framework to protect assets from sophisticated cyberattacks, ensuring the continuity of services fundamental to critical national infrastructure. The sensitivity of critical infrastructure to solar activity, such as gas pipelines, transmission lines, and telecommunication systems, further emphasizes the vulnerability of space operations to external cosmic phenomena. Space weather, influenced by solar magnetic activity, can significantly affect the functionality of navigation and communication systems, making the protection and resilience of these systems against space weather events a priority [8]. The advancement in semantic Web services for space operations facilitates better search, discovery, selection, composition, and integration of services, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of space operations.

Driven by advances in space, information, and communications technologies, India’s space-based services demonstrate the growth potential in commercial space activities [8]. This growth is supported by policy changes favoring deregulation and private sector involvement in space activities. The U.S. Army’s reliance on space products and services illustrates the military’s dependence on space for operational capabilities, highlighting the importance of continued engagement with the space community to ensure development of future space capabilities meets Army requirements.

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA’s) varied operations and the need for unified space operations and access to disparate data sets underscore the complexity of space operations and the necessity for innovative solutions to integrate and manage these operations efficiently [9]. The development of frameworks for critical infrastructure disaster recovery using satellite technology demonstrates the potential for enhancing the resilience of space operations against disasters. The essential role of space systems in military operations and the reliance on satellite control system architectures further highlight the strategic importance of space infrastructure for national security.

Finally, NASA’s tracking and data relay satellite constellation for reestablishing secure network communications post cyberattack illustrates the innovative approaches explored to protect critical network infrastructure.

Research Analysis

Existing space network infrastructure comprises ground station networks that establish links with spacecraft and control centers, supporting mission functionality and safety [10]. With the rise of global satellite constellations, the connection between satellites and ground stations has increased, necessitating efficient position calculations for optimal connectivity. Quantum key distribution via satellite communications shows promise for secure critical delivery to ground stations under challenging daylight conditions, supporting the development of quantum-secured networks. Moreover, the paradigm shift toward Ground Station as a Service models introduces new cybersecurity challenges, prompting analyses of reference architectures and critical nodes for enhanced protection against cyberthreats in space operations. This evolution toward commoditized ground stations and Cloud-based data processing reflects a cost-effective approach in modern space missions, leveraging commercial infrastructure and Cloud technologies for data aggregation and service provision.

The shift toward commercial Cloud technologies and small satellites has reduced costs and transformed the ground segment into a more complex, software-driven operation system. This indicates a move toward commoditizing space mission components [11]. Integrating satellite communication systems with Internet of Things services and the Orbital Cloud Data Storage proposal illustrates satellite communication systems’ expanding capabilities and modernization to support advanced computing architectures like Fog and Edge computing. Exploring 5G and beyond 5G space-based infrastructure underscores ongoing efforts to enhance global coverage and capacity through mid- and long-term architectural advancements, including adopting higher frequency bands and lower satellite orbits.

Lastly, implementing packet-switching schemes based on improved multiprotocol label switching for space communication networks signifies a step toward achieving seamless global communication with enhanced routing and forwarding speeds. Together, these developments encapsulate the current state and forward-looking trends in space network infrastructure, highlighting the integration of advanced technologies and models to meet the growing demands of global communication and data transmission.

Everyday Space Operations Business and Security Requirements

Security requirements for satellite telemetry, tracking, and control (TT&C) systems must align with business objectives to ensure data integrity and communication security [12]. Networked TT&C systems leverage intersatellite communications for efficient operations, requiring secure routing and trust mechanisms to address unique security challenges. Encryption using quantum keys between control apparatus and satellites enhances security for TT&C instructions transmission. Additionally, as satellite communication systems evolve, cybersecurity measures must adapt to combat advanced attacker capabilities, emphasizing physical-layer security and cryptography schemes to safeguard satellite communications links. Aligning security policies with business goals is essential, especially in environments where authorized users may pose threats. This highlights the importance of comprehensive security measures to protect TT&C data and ensure secure communications in satellite operations.

Compromising TT&C systems can severely affect satellite operations and data integrity [13]. Such compromises can lead to incorrect satellite identification, satellite commissioning delays, and communication channel disruptions due to possible disturbances and interference. These systems ensure the satellite’s health and performance, making its safety and reliability fundamental. With exponential increases in active satellites, traditional ground stations face limitations in supporting multiple satellites simultaneously, necessitating innovative solutions like phased array antenna systems with digital beam-forming techniques. Implementing error detection and control mechanisms like forward error correction can help minimize errors without retransmissions, ensuring efficient data transmission and reception. Compromising the TT&C system can significantly impact satellite functionality, communication, and mission success.

Defining Business and Security Goals

Evidence from peer-reviewed sources underscores the critical nature of establishing clear cybersecurity goals and objectives for space networks [9]. It is imperative to define these goals considering the increasing cyberthreats that satellites and space systems encounter. Research demonstrates the importance of integrating security measures for space information networks (SINs) and adopting innovative technologies like AI and blockchain to enhance cybersecurity. Short-term security objectives for protecting space networks require immediate focus on vulnerabilities like cyberthreats and enhanced security measures like anomaly detection [14]. Understanding that long-term security goals involve integrating innovative technologies like AI and blockchain to expand application scenarios while maintaining cybersecurity is essential.

The future space-earth integrated network aims to establish a dynamic security framework based on software-defined networking (SDN) to adjust to changing network structures and enhance overall security measures [14]. Essentially, the security challenges encountered by space information networks highlight the need to embrace comprehensive approaches that combine traditional security practices with emerging technologies to ensure efficient network operation and reliability. Furthermore, developing security protocols such as the bundle protocol security protocol in delay-tolerant networking is vital for constructing reliable networks in space [6]. The susceptibility of space systems to cyberattacks underscores the urgent need for robust cybersecurity measures across the space industry. Organizations can fortify their defenses and mitigate potential risks by adhering to established best practices and standards in space system cybersecurity.

Defining Business and Security Objectives Methods

Achievable goals involve creating a fully prototyped secure framework like distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) for essential space core functions [6]. The key value of DLTs in space revolves around ensuring the integrity, security, and transparency of data that is often exchanged across vast distances, among multiple stakeholders, and under conditions where traditional centralized systems are less effective.

Relevant objectives should include integrating advanced technologies like AI and blockchain into different SIN applications while prioritizing cybersecurity. Time-bound goals should involve implementing deep-learning-based anomaly detection systems for SINs within a specified timeframe. Establishing specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound objectives is essential to improving space network security [15]. Crafting these objectives based on contextual insights will effectively enhance space network security. Specific goals should focus on securing routing mechanisms and enhancing confidentiality through the authentication and key agreement protocol. Measurable targets should seek to quantify the reduction in cyberthreats and space crimes using blockchain and distributed ledger technologies.

Specific Selections of Frameworks and Models

Frameworks like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), International Organization for Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission (ISO/IEC) DLT, ISO/IEC 27000 series, and MITRE SPARTA are being enhanced and explicitly adjusted for space operations, with the primary goal of strengthening information security within this unique domain [16]. The distinct features of space systems create a critical need for security measures surpassing the standard offerings of generic information technology (IT) frameworks.

Adopting ISO/IEC 27001 as a foundational framework is pivotal in managing information security during space missions, providing flexibility to meet mission-specific requirements while ensuring global recognition and compliance. These well-established frameworks protect highly specialized systems such as command and control systems and spacecraft simulators, ensuring confidentiality, integrity, and availability within these vital infrastructures. By customizing and integrating these frameworks, space agencies can develop security controls tailored to the unique value of their systems and the sensitivity of the data involved, significantly improving the overall security posture during space missions.

The NIST cybersecurity framework and the MITRE cybersecurity criteria are pivotal in enhancing cybersecurity measures for various sectors [16]. The NIST framework guides organizations to improve cybersecurity by aligning activities with business drivers and managing risks effectively. On the other hand, the MITRE criteria collaborates with industry and government to combat advanced persistent threats, especially in industrial control systems, emphasizing cyberecosystem defense and security.

In space security, increased reliance on satellite technologies for critical applications underscores the vulnerability to cyberthreats, necessitating robust, defensive cyber countermeasures to safeguard space infrastructure and ensure uninterrupted operations. Both frameworks play critical roles in fortifying cybersecurity across different domains, from traditional IT systems to complex cyberphysical system architectures in space operations.

Defense-In-Depth Modeling Considerations

Defense-in-depth modeling enhances space cybersecurity by providing multiple layers of protection against cyberthreats [17]. This approach involves implementing various defense mechanisms like intrusion detection and tolerance and encryption techniques like the advanced encryption standard. By adopting defense-in-depth strategies, space systems can ensure continuity of service during targeted attacks or component failures. Additionally, the model emphasizes the importance of dynamic defenses and proactive measures to prevent attacks from breaching the network. Incorporating diverse antivirus solutions and custom signature definitions further strengthens the strategy, reducing the time gap between exploit appearance and antivirus updates.

The defense-in-depth model safeguards space communication networks and systems from evolving cyberthreats [17]. It involves implementing multiple layers of independent countermeasures to enhance protection against various attack vectors [18]. This approach is proposed in logic locking to address vulnerabilities against Oracle-guided, Oracle-less, and physical attacks. Additionally, a defense-in-depth strategy in software systems is recommended to protect against vulnerabilities like the Log4j exploit, with five mitigation processes outlined for building comprehensive defense mechanisms (Figure 2). By incorporating various defensive layers and countermeasures, defense-in-depth safeguards critical systems components by providing aggregated protection against attacks, ensuring a more robust security posture.

Business Control Considerations

A strong network security plan should include essential elements such as authentication, authorization, encryption, monitoring, and accounting systems to safeguard against vulnerabilities [19]. When evaluating network strength, it is essential to factor in the effects of disasters on crucial facilities, utilizing metrics like strong components and probabilistic link-removal strategies. Moreover, effective agreements between parties within a network should cover limited liability, risk neutrality, and ambiguity aversion, integrating convertible debt or leveraged equity for effectiveness. Comprehending the mesoscopic structure of a network is essential, as focused attacks can disrupt components, underscoring the significance of influential centrality indicators like strength, betweenness, and PageRank. Finally, a solid road network design approach involves specifying standards, conducting functional analysis, implementing integrated design processes, and performing quality testing to boost network resilience and minimize vulnerability.

Business continuity planning, especially concerning space network protection, is crucial due to the increasing reliance on satellites for various operations [20]. Threats to space systems, both unintentional (like space debris and space weather) and intentional (like antisatellite weapons and cyberattacks), pose significant risks. To enhance business resilience, firms should evaluate the global impact of space weather risks and incorporate these scenarios in their crisis management processes. With the evolving interconnected nature of space systems and the rising interest from hostile entities, safeguarding space missions is becoming imperative. Collaborative efforts within the space industry are essential to define security methodologies and best practices for protecting space systems effectively. Implementing a methodology that tailors safeguard recommendations based on risk assessments can better protect space networks and ensure business continuity.

Standards Control Considerations

Applying standards like ISO/IEC 27001, Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) standards, Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology (COBIT), and Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL) is crucial to enhance space network operations’ efficiency, security, and interoperability [21]. As applied in space operations, ISO/IEC 27001 provides a framework for information security management, allowing risk-oriented management of information security and the opportunity for certification, which is crucial for the diverse and mission-specific requirements of space projects. This standard’s flexibility and international acceptance make it a valuable tool for securing space operations.

CCSDS has developed standards that address various aspects of space data systems, from security guidelines and cryptographic algorithms to data exchange protocols and wireless communications standards. These standards support interoperability, reduce mission costs, and enhance the security and efficiency of space missions. For instance, CCSDS’s work on wireless communications standards aims to meet future spacecraft demands in networking, modularization, and noncable systems, offering significant advantages in reducing spacecraft weight and saving integration time [22].

Additionally, CCSDS’s security guidelines and the selection of cryptographic and authentication algorithms ensure that space and ground infrastructures can interoperate securely and cost-effectively [22]. While COBIT and ITIL are not directly mentioned in the provided contexts, these frameworks’ principles can complement the previously mentioned standards by offering best practices for IT governance and service management. Applying COBIT could help align IT processes with strategic goals. In contrast, ITIL could provide a structured approach to service management, which is beneficial in the complex environment of space network operations.

In summary, the integration of ISO/IEC 27001, CCSDS standards, and the principles of COBIT and ITIL into space network operations can significantly contribute to the security, efficiency, and interoperability of space missions, addressing current and future challenges in space exploration.

Administrations Performance Method Through Audits for Assurance Controls

Regular audits and assessments are conducted to guarantee compliance and efficacy in space network security [23]. Research reveals threats from cybercriminals and adversarial groups. SINs face high susceptibility to network-based assaults, emphasizing the need for security solutions to protect communication and data transmission. A scheduled evaluation for space network security projects is essential due to the rising interconnectedness of space systems and increasing threats. Utilizing dynamic authentication methods with trusted chip support can improve the reliability and security of spaceborne operating systems, ensuring the safety of critical application processes. Examining protocol vulnerabilities and attack strategies across various network layers enables the development of effective defense mechanisms to reduce security risks in space TT&C communication networks. In general, continuous research and advancement are vital to tackling significant challenges and technologies for effectively securing space networks.

Regular audits and assessments form indispensable pillars of a robust security strategy to protect space assets and infrastructure [24]. It is imperative to conduct vulnerability assessments and penetration testing to pinpoint security gaps and predict potential breaches. Moreover, network audits are crucial to evaluating adherence to change control procedures, patching, vulnerability mitigation, and fundamental security configurations. With the integration of SDN in space communication networks, new security hurdles like denial-of-service attacks emerge, necessitating thorough assessments. Additionally, evaluating space mission assurance is critical to fortify the security and longevity of space operations, particularly given the rising threats to space assets.

Monitoring Space Operation Performance Through Business Metrics

Metrics are crucial in evaluating cybersecurity effectiveness for space networks [25]. They provide a quantitative basis for assessing the security status of networks, measuring cyber situational awareness, and determining the impact, sustainability, accessibility, and monitoring of cybersecurity awareness programs. By defining and using security metrics, organizations gauge the effectiveness of security controls, guide future security decisions, and strengthen their security posture. Metrics quantify improvements in network security, enabling accurate evaluation of security status and operational success. By using metrics, organizations can align with regulatory requirements, enhance cybersecurity risk management, and protect sensitive data in space networks. Ultimately, metrics serve as a tool to ensure cyberspace environments’ trustworthiness and minimize cyberincidents’ impact.

Metrics from key performance indicators (KPIs), key risk indicators (KRIs), and key goal indicators (KGIs) play crucial roles in evaluating cybersecurity effectiveness for space networks [6]. These metrics help assess the impact, sustainability, accessibility, and monitoring of cybersecurity awareness programs. Additionally, a set of security metrics, including KPIs, KRIs, and KGIs, have been successfully defined and utilized to determine the security program effectiveness for a fictional company, aligning with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal of Decent Work and Economic Growth. Furthermore, a Markov model of cyberattacks has been developed to construct security metrics, aiding in estimating input parameters and illustrating their use through examples. These metrics provide a systematic and comprehensive approach to evaluating cybersecurity effectiveness in space networks.

Metrics provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of cybersecurity measures implemented to protect space assets and infrastructure [26]. For instance, metrics such as mean time to detect for space-specific threats and mean time to respond to satellite incidents offer a quantitative assessment of the time taken to identify and address security issues in space environments. Additionally, tracking the number of detected intrusions or anomalies can help understand the frequency and nature of cybersecurity incidents occurring within space networks. Justification for utilizing these metrics lies in evaluating cybersecurity effectiveness specifically tailored for space networks, where unique challenges and risks associated with space operations necessitate specialized approaches to threat detection and response. By leveraging these metrics, organizations can enhance their cybersecurity posture and better protect their assets and communications infrastructure in space.

Actionable Resilience and Change Management Considerations

The critical components of space network cyber resilience include the placement of gateways in suitable locations to mitigate cyberattacks and ensure the integrity of information exchange across the aviation system [24]. A hybrid methodology like Applied Systems Thinking enhances system resilience in distributed computing systems. Addressing security vulnerabilities in software bus-dependent satellite systems is essential to prevent catastrophic failures. These components emphasize the importance of optimizing network performance, developing global standards for information exchange integrity, understanding functional interdependencies, and mitigating security weaknesses in space system architectures. By incorporating these elements, space networks can enhance their ability to withstand malicious attacks, ensure secure information exchange, and maintain operational efficiency with minimal human intervention.

Adapting security protection measures to the evolving landscape of space operations is crucial due to the inherent vulnerabilities in wireless links and network security [27]. As space technologies advance, spacecraft functions are increasingly automated, necessitating robust security protocols. The stability of space TT&C communication networks is acknowledged, yet vulnerabilities persist, prompting detailed analysis of transmission control protocol/internet protocol (TCP/IP) layers and the implementation of defense mechanisms. Ensuring the hardware security of very large-scale integration in space through formal verification methods is essential to prevent tampering and system downtime, highlighting the significance of proactive security evaluations and design improvements. By integrating consortium blockchain technology, adapting network security deployment, and continuously enhancing security measures, space operations can mitigate cyberthreats and maintain operational integrity amidst technological advancements and evolving attack methods.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this research study aimed to develop a comprehensive strategy for enhancing the cybersecurity of space networks by implementing a holistic approach addressing various aspects of network protection shown in Figure 3. The image details the space network protection strategy, focusing on a holistic approach, technological integration, business alignment, operational security, and future directions. Key aspects include advanced encryption, quantum key distribution, regular audits, and the adoption of emerging technologies like AI and blockchain.

Using various security measures strategically is crucial in safeguarding space network infrastructures against potential cyberthreats and ensuring their resilience. The significance of cybersecurity in protecting space networks is immense given their vital role in military operations and the growing dependence on them for operational capabilities. The susceptibility of space operations to external cosmic events and the importance of satellite control system architectures underscore the strategic value of space infrastructure for national security.

To boost the resilience of space operations against disasters, it is recommended that future studies concentrate on creating frameworks for disaster recovery of critical infrastructure utilizing satellite technology. Additionally, the defense-in-depth strategy, which incorporates various defense layers and countermeasures, is recommended to protect against vulnerabilities like the Log4j exploit.

Future research should also explore optimizing network performance, developing global standards for information exchange integrity, and mitigating security weaknesses in space system architectures. By focusing on these areas, research can enhance space networks’ security posture, ensure secure information exchange, and maintain operational efficiency with minimal human intervention.

References

1. Adelsbach, A., T. Schaefer, and G. Tountas. “New Space Architectures – Connectivity and Cyber Security.” Space Law in a Networked World, pp. 18–38, 2023.
2. Koisser, D., D. Fischer, M. Wallum, and A. R. Sadeghi. “Trusat: Building Cyber Trust in Collaborative Spacecraft Networks.” https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO53065.2022.9843330, 2022.
3. Jenkins, C., E. Vurgin, I. Manickam, N. Troutman, J. Hazelbaker, S. Krakowiak, J. Maxwell, and R. Brown. “Moving Target Defense for Space Systems.” IEEE Space Computing Conference (SCC), 2021.
4. Jeon, S., J. Kwak, and J. Choi. “Advanced Multibeam Satellite Network Security With Encryption and Beamforming Technologies.” IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), 2022.
5. Maple, C., G. Epiphaniou, W. Hathal, U. I. Atmaca, A. Sheik, H. Cruickshank, and G. Falco. “The Impact of Message Encryption on Teleoperation for Space Applications.” IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO), 2022.
6. Falco, G. “Cybersecurity Principles for Space Systems.” Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 61–70, 2019.
7. Gheorghe, A. V., J. C. Payne, J. Sisti, J., C. B. Keating, P. F. Katina, and W. Edmonson. “Critical Space Infrastructure: A Complex System Governance Perspective.” International Journal of Cyber Diplomacy, vol. 4, 2023.
8. Facskó, G., G. Koban, N. Biró, and M. Lkhagvadorj. “Space Weather Effects on Critical Infrastructure.” Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications, pp. 45–56, 2024.
9. Zhuo, M., L. Liu, S. Zhou, and Z. Tian. “Survey on Security Issues of Routing and Anomaly Detection for Space Information Networks.” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, 15 November 2021.
10. Boschetti, N., C. Smethurust, G. Epiphaniou, C. Maple, J. Sigholm, and G. Falco. “Ground Station as a Service Reference Architectures and Cyber Security Attack Tree Analysis.” IEEE Aerospace Conference, March 2023.
11. Tubío-Pardavila, R., and N. Kurahara. “Ground Station Networks.” Cubesat Handbook, pp. 353–364, 2020.
12. Zhan, Y., G. Zeng, and X. Pan. “Networked TT&C for Mega Satellite Constellations: A Security Perspective.” China Communications, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 58–76, 2022.
13. Zhan, Y., P. Wan, C. Jiang, X. Pan, X. Chen, and S. Guo. “Challenges and Solutions for the Satellite Tracking, Telemetry, and Command System.” IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 12–18, December 2020.
14. Jiang, C., X. Wang, J. Wang, H. H. Chen, and Y. Ren. “Security in Space Information Networks.” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 82–88, 2015.
15. Wu, X., Y. Du, T. Fan, J. Guo, J. Ren, R. Wu, and T. Zheng. “Threat Analysis for Space Information Network Based on Network Security Attributes: A Review.” Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 3429–3468, 2022.
16. Möller, D. F. “NIST Cybersecurity Framework and Mitre Cybersecurity Criteria.” Advances in Information Security, pp. 231–271, 2023.
17. Groat, S., J. Tront, and R. Marchany. “Advancing the Defense in Depth Model.” The 7th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE), 2012.
18. Feng, S., and M. Lubis. “Defense-in-Depth Security Strategy in Log4j Vulnerability Analysis.” 2022 International Conference Advancement in Data Science, E-learning and Information Systems (ICADEIS), 2022.
19. Dong, S., H. Wang, A. Mostafavi, and J. Gao. “Robust Component: A Robustness Measure that Incorporates Access to Critical Facilities Under Disruptions.” Journal of The Royal Society Interface, vol. 16, no. 157, 2019.
20. Berthoud, L., and S. Agass. “Identifying Space Threats for SpaceAware Resilience—A Spacecraft and Satellite Service Resilience Model.” IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO), 2022.
21. Rick, T. M. “A Multi-Center Space Data System Prototype Based on CCSDS Standards.” IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2016.
22. Berry, D. “Using CCSDS Standards for Space Situational Awareness.” SpaceOPS 2014 Conference, 2009.
23. Wang, R. “Research on WBS-RBS Oriented Security Risk Assessment Index System for Space Domain Private Network.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2489, no. 1, pp. 12021–12021, 2023.
24. Yuan, S., P. Liu, and E. Zhao. “Research on Security Protection of the Communication Network for Space TT&C Based on TCP/IP Protocol Vulnerabilities.” Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering Conference, pp. 557–566, November 2018.
25. Chaudhary, S., V. Gkioulos, and S. Katsikas. “Developing Metrics to Assess the Effectiveness of Cybersecurity Awareness Program.” Journal of Cybersecurity, vol. 8, no. 1, 2022.
26. Bhol, S., J. R. Mohanty, and P. Pattnaik. “Cyber Security Metrics Evaluation Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach.” Smart Intelligent Computing and Applications, Springer, pp. 665–675, 2019.
27. Yang, Z., L. Shaofeng, and T. Chenyang. “Research on Security Protection of Space-Earth Integrated Network Wireless Link Based on Consortium Blockchain Technology and Application.” IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Big Data and Algorithms (EEBDA), 2023.

Biography

Edward Smith is a military service member serving as an information security program manager, datalink and sensor network instructor, knowledge manager, and an International Information System Security Certification Consortium member and cybersecurity exam development volunteer. His certifications include a Certificate of Cloud Security Knowledge, Systems Security Certified Practitioner, Exposure Management Expert, MAD 20 Cyber Threat Intelligence, and Purple Teaming Methodology. Mr. Smith holds a B.S. in interdisciplinary studies with cybersecurity applications and management, an M.Sc. in unmanned systems with space operations, an M.Sc. in aeronautics with air traffic management and space studies from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, and is in his final year of a Ph.D. in secure Cloud computing through National University.